|
Many valid claims have foundered on inexact technical descriptions, and it is
here that specialist advice is most widely recommended. Also, interpretations
change continually, in response to changes in tax law or policy, and expert help
is often advised.
Once filed, the claim is internally reviewed by CRA
for both technical substance and financial congruity. CRA normally visits all
first-time claimants to explain the program in more detail and set expectations
for subsequent claims. The science and financial reviews may be conducted
sequentially or jointly. These reviews are confined to SR&ED and are not audits
of the company’s affairs. The review process varies depending on the quality and
magnitude of the claim. A history of credible claims, without adjustments,
reduces the processing time.
Since many first-time claimants are not aware of the
program, especially while the work was being undertaken, CRA will generally
allow reasonable first claims with less than ideal documentation. Nonetheless,
documents are central to demonstrating a systematic investigation. Claimants
should assemble documentation at the earliest opportunity, ideally at the
conceptual or discussion stages of a project; evidence of a planned approach is
preferred. Costs for development should be separated from other activities
insofar as is possible. Now is a good time to start documenting any current
undocumented projects. Diaries, photographs, sketches and meeting notes are all
effective indicators of project work.
After review, the majority of claimants receive a
refund cheque or tax credits to offset taxes owing. The SR&ED claim is a source
of cash for R&D work and is considered income in the following taxation year.
|
|